Page 153 - 2023-bfw-IdeasLit-TE-1e.indd
P. 153

®
 196  Unit 2   ■   Analyzing Comparisons and Representations  Preparing for the AP  Exam   ■   Free-Response Question: Poetry Analysis  197  UNIT 2
                   •  How does the comparison relate to an idea?
 Effect of Literary   •  What insight about the human experience can you glean from that idea?
 Unifying   Sonnet 73    Elements and                                                   PREPARING FOR THE AP ®  EXAM
 Idea  William Shakespeare  Techniques  In “Sonnet  73,” Shakespeare uses  comparison  by including  three  distinct
                 metaphors within the poem. You should first examine the details of the compari-
 mortality  That time of year thou mayst in me behold  speaker compared   son subjects (winter, twilight, and a dying fire) and associate them with the main
 When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang  to dying season    subject (the speaker). Next, you can draw upon your experiences with these  objects
 Upon those boughs which shake against the cold,  to infer that the speaker is aging and therefore facing his imminent death  (unifying
 Bare ruin’d choirs, where late the sweet birds sang.  idea). Your experiences then help you understand the perspective in the speaker’s
                       Copyright (c) 2023 Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishers. Uncorrected proofs were used with this sample chapter.
                 final revelation: his loved one grows fonder of him because of the  realization of his
 5  In me thou see’st the twilight of such day  speaker compared   mortality.
 mortality  As after sunset fadeth in the west,  to end of day
 Which by and by black night doth take away,  ➔  Step Two: Develop a Defensible Thesis Statement   INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS
 Death’s second self, that seals up all in rest.
                         Distributed by Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishers. Strictly for use with its products. Not for redistribution.
 In me thou see’st the glowing of such fire  speaker compared to   and a Unified Line of Reasoning  Step Two: Develop a Defensible Thesis
 10  That on the ashes of his youth doth lie,  dying fire  To decide how to subdivide your literary argument into manageable topics of   Statement and a Unified Line of Reasoning
 mortality  As the death-bed whereon it must expire,    discussion, consider the following questions:  In the first three units, teachers should continue
                                                                                                to help students combine their unifying idea and
 Consum’d with that which it was nourish’d by.  •  Are some details or images in contrast or tension within the text?  an insight (so what about the idea?) to convey
 This thou perceiv’st, which makes thy love more   insight: love grows   •  Is an idea presented in a complex or contradictory manner?  their interpretation of the poem. Review the
 strong,  stronger with the   •  Is there a shift in point of view, perspective, or tone within the text?  templates and models provided in the workshop.
 threat of the death of
 To love that well which thou must leave ere long.  a loved one                                 Next, guide students to choose the author
                   •  Are contrasting ideas, images, or perspectives juxtaposed within the text?
                   •  Do different literary techniques work together to reveal the final message?  techniques that will inform their line of reasoning
                                                                                                and link to the idea included in the thesis. The
                    In all of these questions, two or more topics emerge for discussion. When
 ➔  Step One: Annotate the Passage Based on a   you develop your line of reasoning, you will explore the topics one at a time and   topic sentences are driven by these techniques.
                                                                                                Students will need constant practice in
 Unifying Idea   include evidence for support within each body paragraph.                       determining the difference between techniques
 Unlike the prose fiction analysis question that you practiced in Unit 1, the poetry   In Unit 1, you learned to write a thesis statement that includes a  defensible   (i.e., what an author does) and elements (i.e., the
 analysis question most often includes an entire poem rather than a short excerpt   claim. Remember that your claim must include the interpretation of the text   tools an author uses).
 from a longer text for you to interpret. When you identify a unifying idea in a full   (idea + insight). You will now practice developing a logical sequence of reasons to
 poem, your goal is to arrive at an interpretation of the whole work.    support your thesis statement called the line of reasoning. To develop your  literary
 To communicate an insight about an idea, poets often write using condensed lan-    argument, you should have two or more reasons that will serve as topic sentences
 guage and, at times, unusual sentence structure, which requires you to read carefully   for the body paragraphs to prove the validity of your interpretation. These reasons
 and methodically. Poetic language is highly sensory with words that have strong con-  are often guided by the author’s techniques within the text.
 notations. Additionally, to represent ideas, poets often compare familiar images and   Techniques represent the author’s literary “moves,” while elements are the  specific
 objects to more abstract concepts. The two most common comparison techniques   tools the author uses to create the technique. You should use the  techniques to guide
 you will encounter are metaphor and simile. In a poem, these comparisons shed light   your line of reasoning and the elements to support that line of reasoning. A line of
 on the speaker’s attitude, tone, or deeper understanding of an experience. To interpret   reasoning may be organized by techniques. An author’s techniques (e.g., imagery, con-
 this deeper understanding, you must make associations between the literal context in   trast, comparison) are made up of elements. Techniques are larger than elements.
 the poem and the overall figurative meaning suggested by the comparisons.  Furthermore, just as the author planned the order of the events and details
 Consider these questions as you read and annotate for comparisons in poetry:  within a text, you should carefully consider the order in which you present your
                 topics of discussion to analyze those details. In other words, if you have identified
 •  What are the qualities of the literal or familiar object (also called the   a shift in tone or perspective, then you can explain the details before the shift first,
 comparison subject)?  and then develop the details after the shift.
 •  How do these qualities relate to — or reveal — characteristics of the main   As a word of caution, you should avoid simply summarizing or paraphrasing a
 subject of comparison?  text. Summary is not analysis. The purpose of a line of reasoning is to avoid such a








 03_williamlit1e_46174_ch02_116_207.indd   196  22/09/22   9:47 AM  03_williamlit1e_46174_ch02_116_207.indd   197  22/09/22   9:47 AM






















                                                                                ®
                                                                 Preparing for the AP  Exam     Free-Response Question: Poetry Analysis  197





          03_williamlitte1e_47545_ch02_116_207_3pp.indd   197                                                                   08/12/22   5:48 PM
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158